Continuum
Management
Why Continuum Management Works!
Whether high volume - low mix, low volume - high mix, make to order,
engineer to order, or make to stock, the continuum management process
succeeds by having all departments evolve their processes and behaviors
along performance
continuums. Having all functions evolve their capabilities while
simultaneously maintaining process predictability yields the ability
to produce smaller lot sizes - resulting in shorter cycle times,
lower inventories, and increased profits.
The continuum management goal is the same as other management strategies - improved competitiveness
and profitability. One distinguishing difference exists on how the continuum
management process achieves the goal. Early on, employees receive descriptions
and training on function and process continuums. Describing activities
along performance continuums shortens the project selection cycle time;
employees have the ability to self-assess discrete processes and identify
the next logical activities to be made predictable.
The continuum management process flourishes when employees see their efforts produce predictable
results. Seeing results further energizes employees to work on projects
that evolve functions and processes along continuums.
Benefits of Continuum Management
Although the financial benefits of implementing continuum
managment are significant, they are an after-the-fact measure,
a report card, of doing many things right. The greatest and longest
lasting benefit of continuum management is its impact on the culture
aspect of running a business - employee collaboration and cooperation
to improve the system-wide performance of the company.
Below are benefits resulting from the implementation of the continuum management process. Many of
these are the same benefits realized by skillfully implementing Lean,
Theory of Constraints, Six Sigma, or other management strategies.
-
Reduction
of inventory, scrap and rework, stock outs, and cycle times
Implementation Timeline
The continuum management process segments a company's performance
into four stages:
Start up, Systems Development, Functional Integration, and Company-Wide
Optimization "Lean".
The following five drivers are critical; they affect the rate for
a company to evolve toward a Stage 4 operation. Absence
of any ONE driver will stagnate or derail the entire effort (i.e.
"Show Stopper").
-
Senior
management knowledge, support, and involvement are pivotal.
Without
support and involvement all improvement efforts are futile. Management's
effectiveness at establishing meaningful and realistic expectations,
providing real-time feedback, capital, human resources, and removing
inhibiting policies and obstacles all act as catalysts to achieving
and sustaining a Stage 4 operation.
-
A
broad set of accurate, reliable, and accessible operational
and financial information have a multifaceted impact
on the timeline of achieving a Stage 4 operation. Reliable information
provides decision makers with a more complete understanding
of the tradeoffs associated with every business decision which
allows for the best choice among many alternatives. Through
analysis, processes with significant variability are readily
identified and targeted for improvement. A broad set of operational
and financial information sustains improvement projects by providing
evidence that operational changes are occurring. Finally, undisputable
information has a major impact on the rate of implementation
by short circuiting the debate process and aligning employees
toward the activities that require the highest priority.
-
Employees'
knowledge, skills, abilities, and availability affect
the rate of evolution - the greater the breadth, depth, and
availability, the greater the velocity of implementation. Employees
with these attributes in conjunction with the continuum management
process codify a solid understanding of the strategic benefits
and technical expertise to integrate existing and new technologies
in a logical and timely manner.
-
Interdepartmental
communication and collaboration are critical as a company
attempts to evolve from Stage 2, Systems Development, to Stage
3, Functional Integration - attempting to reduce inventories
and gain flexibility through reduced cycle times. To achieve
and sustain Stage 3 and continue on to Stage 4, functions must
share information and work collaboratively to overcome information
and process mistakes and misinterpretations that occur when
information passes among departments. The absence of cooperation
and collaboration will hamper and possibly ruin the ability
of a company to predictably operate at Stage 3.
Some consultants and scholars may argue that technology should be
included as a critical driver. The Continuum Management Group, LLC,
disagrees. The competent selection, integration, and utilization
of technology allow a company to evolve performance. These activities
are completed by people - hence, the criticality of employees' knowledge,
skills, abilities, and availability. Technology does not make tactical
or strategic decisions; people do.
What is the calendar timeline to achieve a Stage 4 operation? Considering
all the critical drivers listed above, most companies can achieve
a sustainable company-wide (all departments and processes) Stage
2 operation within 12 to 24 months. With Stage 2 in place, anticipate
12 to 24 months to achieve a sustainable company-wide Stage 3 performance.
Achieving a sustainable Stage 4 operation is a magnificent accomplishment
few companies ever realize. With a sustained effort, companies should
plan on devoting 12 to 24 months beyond achieving a sustainable
Stage 3 operation. The overall time frame to evolve from an unpredictable
Stage 2 operation to a predictable Stage 4 operation is affected
by many factors, but can be successfully compressed if management
is committed.While
a company evolves toward a Stage 4 operation, wastes (nonvalue-adding
costs) are continually being eliminated, simultaneously production
flexibility is migrating to match market demand. On a part number/finish
good basis, order to ship cycle time, batch size, and production
cost should all depict a downward trend.
|